PRINCE Harry is due to appear in court today after a judge accused him of wasting time when he didn’t arrive for the first day of a High Court trial.
The Duke of Sussex is the first Royal to be questioned in court in more than 130 years – expected to give evidence in the phone hacking trial.
Prince Harry (pictured in March) was accused of wasting time by failing to attend the first day of his trial
Harry was ordered to be available to give evidence against Mirror Group Newspapers
He was due to appear at the High Court yesterday as part of the action against the Mirror Group Newspapers.
But he only flew in from the US on Sunday night after marking his daughter Lilibet’s second birthday.
Justice Fancourt told the High Court he was surprised Harry, 38, was not in court on stand-by for the witness box on the trial’s first day.
The Duke of Sussex is today due to give evidence in his case against the Daily Mirror’s publisher over alleged unlawful information gathering.
On Monday, Harry’s individual case against Mirror Group Newspapers (MGN) got under way.
The judge reminded his legal team he had directed that the King’s son be available yesterday.
But Harry’s barrister David Sherborne KC, claimed his client was in a “different category” and that it was a “little tricky” to get him to court, blaming travel and security difficulties.
Andrew Green KC, for MGN, told the hearing: “It is absolutely extraordinary that we were told only yesterday that he was not available for day one of his trial.
“We are deeply troubled by that.
“We have done everything we can to be responsible and not waste court time.
“Now we are going to have some wasted time this afternoon.”
Today Harry will become the first royal questioned in a UK courtroom for 130 years.
And he’s the first senior royal to be involved in court proceedings since 2002, when the Princess Royal pleaded guilty to a charge under the Dangerous Dogs Act after her pet bit two children in Windsor Great Park.
Cross-examination — which could tackle stories of his drug use and relationship with ex Chelsy Davy — are expected to last up to two days after the judge granted barristers more time to grill him under oath.
It means Harry will be in the UK longer than for the coronation.
Last month he spent 28 hours here before flying back to California for son Archie’s fourth birthday.
Yesterday, his lawyer Mr Sherborne told the court: “The Duke of Sussex is attending tomorrow to give evidence.
“He flew yesterday evening from Los Angeles after his daughter’s birthday.”
He told the court his opening submissions would take three hours, meaning Harry would not be needed until Tuesday.
But Justice Fancourt replied: “I’m slightly surprised in light of direction at earlier stage.”
Sherborne added: “He is in a different category from the three other claimants due to his travel and security arrangements.
He also claimed getting Harry to court was a “little tricky”.
And he said: “It was never anticipated the openings would not take the whole day.”
Mr Justice Fancourt replied: “It was anticipated that they might — which is why I directed that the first witness should be available.”
The judge also ticked off Harry’s legal team after Mr Sherborne’s opening submissions overran by 25 minutes.
He said: “We really can’t keep having timetable chaos on a day by day basis. We really must get on.”
Mr Sherbourne had said unlawful activities were “habitual and widespread” at MGN between 1996 and 2011.
He claimed there was no time in Harry’s life when he was safe from phone hacking and blagging.
But Mr Green called Harry’s claims “rather fantastical”.
He said: “There’s no evidence capable of finding that the duke was ever hacked let alone hacked on a habitual basis.”
The case was eventually adjourned at 4.38pm.
Several high-profile figures, including Harry, are bringing damages claims against MGN over alleged unlawful information gathering at its titles.
Harry alleges that about 140 articles published between 1996 and 2010 contained information gathered using unlawful methods, and 33 of these have been selected to be considered at the trial.
However, Andrew Green KC, for MGN, said Harry’s claim had “become rather fantastical”.
The barrister also said a suggestion that its journalists had hacked the phone of the late Diana, Princess of Wales was “total speculation”.
The publisher has apologised unreservedly to Prince Harry for unlawfully gathering information about him but denies phone hacking.
MGN also argues that some of the claimants brought their legal action too late.
Harry’s claim is being heard alongside three other “representative” claims during a trial which began last month and is due to last six to seven weeks.
Justice Fancourt told the High Court he was surprised Harry was not in court on stand-by for the witness box
Harry’s barrister David Sherborne KC, claimed his client was in a ‘different category’
